ITF M15 · Round of 16 · M15 Islamabad
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Meng
⚙️ Grinder
Qabazard
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 63% vs 🏃 Pusher across 581 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Fanming Meng here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Meng | Qabazard |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–4 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 3.33 | 4.54 |
| ROI % | -52.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -3.12u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Meng
0
Qabazard
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Meng | Qabazard |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.6% | 60.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.1% | 59.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 44.4% | 36.9% |
| Aces / Match | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 3.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 66.6% | 40.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.1% | 37% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.9% | 49.8% |
| BP Converted % | 53.1% | 36.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51% | 46.2% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 62% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Fanming Meng and Essa Qabazard face off in the Round of 16 at M15 Islamabad on Hard.
Fanming Meng leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Fanming Meng is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Pawit Sornlaksup (Jun 10).
Essa Qabazard is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bogdan Seleznev (Jun 15).
Share this match
