ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Lima
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bagnis
⚙️ Grinder
Munar
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,130 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jaume Munar here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Bagnis | Munar |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 4–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.00 |
| ROI % | - | -47.1% |
| Units P/L | - | -5.18u |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Bagnis
2
Munar
Feb 9, 2024
Cordoba
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Apr 10, 2019
Marrakech
C Clay · Round of 32
Jun 9, 2018
Caltanissetta
C Clay · Round of 16
Oct 16, 2017
Lima
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Bagnis | Munar |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 63.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 52% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 63.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 29.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 57.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 33.4% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 22.1 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 25 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 70.6% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 51% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 40% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Facundo Bagnis and Jaume Munar face off in the Round of 16 at Lima on Clay.
Facundo Bagnis leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Facundo Bagnis is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Francesco Maestrelli (Sep 29).
Jaume Munar is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Martin Damm (Jun 9).
Share this match
