WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Indian Wells
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bouchard
🏹 Frontrunner
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 62% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 458 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Eugenie Bouchard here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Bouchard | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.74 |
| ROI % | - | -68.2% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.41u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Bouchard
0
Stephens
Aug 8, 2016
Olympics
H Hard · Round of 64
Mar 7, 2016
Indian Wells
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Bouchard | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 65.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 46.8% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 56.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 25.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 39.4% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 49.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 40.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Eugenie Bouchard and Sloane Stephens face off in the Round of 64 at Indian Wells on Hard.
Eugenie Bouchard leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Eugenie Bouchard is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Belinda Bencic (Jul 27).
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Share this match
