WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Prague
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shibahara
🤖 Servebot
Korpatsch
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,124 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Ena Shibahara here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Shibahara | Korpatsch |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 5–8 |
| Avg odds | 1.41 | 4.01 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -21.5% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -2.79u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Shibahara
0
Korpatsch
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Shibahara | Korpatsch |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.7% | 62.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 61.4% | 52.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50% | 40.6% |
| Aces / Match | 7 | 1.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 8 | 2.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 50% | 52.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 42.3% | 31.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 29.7% | 55.3% |
| BP Converted % | 33.3% | 56.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 46.2% | 43.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 63% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Ena Shibahara and Tamara Korpatsch face off in the Round of 32 at Prague on Clay.
Ena Shibahara leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Ena Shibahara is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Misaki Matsuda (Mar 30).
Tamara Korpatsch is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Camelia Begu (Jun 20).
Share this match
