ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Tallahassee
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nava
⚙️ Grinder
Wu
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 54% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 993 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tung-Lin Wu here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Nava | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 16–9 | 11–7 |
| Avg odds | 1.98 | 1.75 |
| ROI % | -2.4% | -13.4% |
| Units P/L | -0.59u | -2.41u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Nava
0
Wu
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Wu has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Nava's 0%).
| Opponent | Nava | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | L 16 36 | W 64 64 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Nava | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65% | 69.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.8% | 74.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.2% | 50% |
| Aces / Match | 5.6 | 3.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.2 | 1.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.7% | 51.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.8% | 34.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.3% | 55.7% |
| BP Converted % | 41.9% | 45% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 30.7 | 14.7 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 41.8 | 15.3 |
| Net Pts Won % | 64.8% | 85.2% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.4% | 54.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 65% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Emilio Nava and Tung-Lin Wu face off in the Round of 16 at Tallahassee on Clay.
Emilio Nava leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Emilio Nava is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hamish Stewart (Jun 20).
Tung-Lin Wu is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Adam Walton (Jun 3).
Share this match
