ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Charlottesville
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nava
⚙️ Grinder
Ponwith
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 63% vs 🏃 Pusher across 581 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Emilio Nava here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Nava | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 16–9 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.98 | - |
| ROI % | -2.4% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.59u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Nava
0
Ponwith
Mar 14, 2023
Phoenix
H Hard · 2nd Round Qualifying
Nov 1, 2022
Charlottesville
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Nava | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.2% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 5.6 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.7% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 41.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 30.7 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 41.8 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 64.8% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.4% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Emilio Nava and Nathan Ponwith face off in the Round of 32 at Charlottesville on Hard.
Emilio Nava leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Emilio Nava is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hamish Stewart (Jun 20).
Nathan Ponwith is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Branko Djuric (Mar 16).
Share this match
