ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Shymkent 2
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nava
⚙️ Grinder
Karlovskiy
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
Both Emilio Nava and Evgeny Karlovskiy are ⚙️ Grinder types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 4,528 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Nava | Karlovskiy |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 16–9 | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.98 | 2.40 |
| ROI % | -2.4% | -44.7% |
| Units P/L | -0.59u | -1.34u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Nava
0
Karlovskiy
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Nava | Karlovskiy |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65% | 73.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.8% | 66% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.2% | 44% |
| Aces / Match | 5.6 | 2.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.7% | 61.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.8% | 24.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.3% | 52.9% |
| BP Converted % | 41.9% | 51.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 30.7 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 41.8 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 64.8% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.4% | 48% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 65% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Emilio Nava and Evgeny Karlovskiy face off in the Quarterfinals at Shymkent 2 on Clay.
Emilio Nava leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Emilio Nava is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hamish Stewart (Jun 20).
Evgeny Karlovskiy is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Robin Catry (May 18).
Share this match
