WTA 1000 · Round of 128 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Arango
🪃 Counterpuncher
Tomova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,807 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Emiliana Arango here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Arango | Tomova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–7 | 1–3 |
| Avg odds | 2.29 | 3.01 |
| ROI % | -13.5% | -58.3% |
| Units P/L | -1.76u | -2.33u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Arango
0
Tomova
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Arango | Tomova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 73.6% | 62.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 62.4% | 61% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.3% | 47% |
| Aces / Match | 1.4 | 2.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 46.5% | 61.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 39.9% | 40.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 56.8% | 43.6% |
| BP Converted % | 39.2% | 39.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.3% | 48.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 45% | 40% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Emiliana Arango and Viktoriya Tomova face off in the Round of 128 at Rome on Clay.
Emiliana Arango leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Emiliana Arango is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Alycia Parks (Jun 20).
Viktoriya Tomova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Greet Minnen (Jun 6).
Share this match
