ATP Challenger Tour · Semifinals · Fergana
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ruusuvuori
💥 Big Hitter
Sultanov
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 4,745 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Emil Ruusuvuori here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ruusuvuori | Sultanov |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.54 |
| ROI % | - | -2.5% |
| Units P/L | - | -0.10u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ruusuvuori
0
Sultanov
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ruusuvuori | Sultanov |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 58.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 75.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 53.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 9.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 64.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 21.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 41.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 10% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 21 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 10 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 100% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Emil Ruusuvuori and Khumoyun Sultanov face off in the Semifinals at Fergana on Hard.
Emil Ruusuvuori leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Emil Ruusuvuori is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Francesco Maestrelli (Nov 18).
Khumoyun Sultanov is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Fajing Sun (Apr 16).
Share this match
