WTA 1000 · Round of 128 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cocciaretto
🪃 Counterpuncher
Rodionova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 793 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Elisabetta Cocciaretto here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cocciaretto | Rodionova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.47 | - |
| ROI % | -0.7% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.02u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Cocciaretto
0
Rodionova
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cocciaretto | Rodionova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 36.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.5% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.2% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 50% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Elisabetta Cocciaretto and Arina Rodionova face off in the Round of 128 at Beijing on Hard.
Elisabetta Cocciaretto leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Elisabetta Cocciaretto is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Emma Navarro (May 5).
Arina Rodionova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Storm Hunter (Oct 27).
Share this match
