ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Split 2
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ymer
⚙️ Grinder
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 👑 The Complete Package is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Elias Ymer plays Cem Ilkel.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ymer | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–5 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.55 | 3.61 |
| ROI % | -9.2% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.01u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ymer
0
Ilkel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ymer | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.8% | 53.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.9% | 70.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.4% | 51.2% |
| Aces / Match | 3.8 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.4% | 71.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.6% | 41.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.3% | 46.4% |
| BP Converted % | 42.3% | 100% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 16.5 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 24.8 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 66.6% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.2% | 53.8% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 33% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Elias Ymer and Cem Ilkel face off in the Quarterfinals at Split 2 on Clay.
Elias Ymer leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Elias Ymer is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ugo Humbert (Jun 8).
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Share this match
