WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Cluj Napoca
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ruse
💥 Big Hitter
Bondar
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Elena Gabriela Ruse plays Anna Bondar.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ruse | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–2 | 9–9 |
| Avg odds | 2.22 | 3.27 |
| ROI % | +83.0% | +12.4% |
| Units P/L | +9.13u | +2.23u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ruse
0
Bondar
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 5 shared opponents, both Ruse and Bondar posted a 20% win rate.
| Opponent | Ruse | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | W | L |
| Eva Bennemann | L 67 67 | W |
| Mirra Andreeva | L 46 16 | L 76 36 67 |
| Madison Keys | L 06 36 | L 26 57 |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | L 57 26 | L 67 46 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ruse | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 54.5% | 63.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 59.8% | 63.9% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.6% | 48.9% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 3.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.3 | 1.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 47.1% | 67.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 38.3% | 35.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 55.2% | 58.1% |
| BP Converted % | 54.2% | 47% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.6% | 51.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Elena Gabriela Ruse and Anna Bondar face off in the Round of 16 at Cluj Napoca on Hard.
Elena Gabriela Ruse leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Elena Gabriela Ruse is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Emma Navarro (Jun 25).
Anna Bondar is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Emma Navarro (Jun 15).
Share this match
