ATP Challenger Tour · 2nd Round Qualifying · Fairfield
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Winter
⚙️ Grinder
Brumm
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (50% vs 50%, 2,804 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Edward Winter plays Jacob Brumm.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Winter | Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.61 | - |
| ROI % | +9.2% | - |
| Units P/L | +0.55u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Winter
0
Brumm
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Winter | Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.8% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 65.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.7 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 53.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 23.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 21.8% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 14.8 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 31.8 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 67.2% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 46.2% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 83% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Edward Winter and Jacob Brumm face off in the 2nd Round Qualifying at Fairfield on Hard.
Edward Winter leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Edward Winter is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexander Donski (Jun 4).
Jacob Brumm is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Drew Van Orderlain (Nov 9).
Share this match
