ITF M25 · Round of 32 · M25 Faro
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ambarzumjan
⚙️ Grinder
Handel
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 🛡️ The Spoiler is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,871 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Edison Ambarzumjan plays Tim Handel.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ambarzumjan | Handel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | 4.06 | 3.60 |
| ROI % | -60.8% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -3.04u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ambarzumjan
0
Handel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ambarzumjan | Handel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.7% | 56.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 62.8% | 67.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 49% | 45.2% |
| Aces / Match | 1.2 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.6 | 3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 38.8% | 37.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 27.2% | 33.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50% | 52.5% |
| BP Converted % | 41.1% | 45.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 12 | 13 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 18 | 23 |
| Net Pts Won % | 42.9% | 71.4% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.6% | 49% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 17% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Edison Ambarzumjan and Tim Handel face off in the Round of 32 at M25 Faro on Hard.
Edison Ambarzumjan leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Edison Ambarzumjan is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Axel Garcian (Jun 9).
Tim Handel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daniel Siniakov (Jun 9).
Share this match
