WTA 250 Β· Round of 32 Β· Sydney
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cibulkova
π― Baseliner
Siegemund
πΉ Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
The πΉ Frontrunner archetype wins about 54% vs π― Baseliner across 236 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Laura Siegemund here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the baseliner's precise groundstrokes. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Cibulkova | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5β8 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.26 |
| ROI % | - | -33.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -4.29u |
Prior meetings and scores Β· 2 career meetings
2
Cibulkova
0
Siegemund
Jan 9, 2017
Sydney
H Hard Β· Round of 32
Sep 26, 2016
Wuhan
H Hard Β· Round of 32
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Cibulkova | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 75.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 55.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 38.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 60.8% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 52.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Dominika Cibulkova and Laura Siegemund face off in the Round of 32 at Sydney on Hard.
Dominika Cibulkova leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Dominika Cibulkova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aryna Sabalenka (May 27).
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (Jun 23).
Share this match