ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Quimper
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stricker
👑 The Complete Package
Marchenko
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 1,189 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Illya Marchenko here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stricker | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.00 | - |
| ROI % | -42.1% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.37u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Stricker
0
Marchenko
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stricker | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.1% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 76.3% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 55.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 6 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 49.6% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 28.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50.5% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 55.7% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 14 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 27.5 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 38.5% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 50% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Dominic Stricker and Illya Marchenko face off in the Round of 16 at Quimper on Hard.
Dominic Stricker leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Dominic Stricker is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kai Wehnelt (Jun 19).
Illya Marchenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Cagan Efe Tufecki (Jan 5).
Share this match
