ITF W · Caserta ITF
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cherubini
🪃 Counterpuncher
Rame
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚔️ The Gladiator is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 5,778 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Diletta Cherubini plays Alice Rame.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cherubini | Rame |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.86 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Cherubini
0
Rame
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Rame has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Cherubini's 33%).
| Opponent | Cherubini | Rame |
|---|---|---|
| Alessandra Mazzola | W 61 62 | W 64 46 64 |
| Mai Hontama | L 26 16 | W 63 61 |
| Lisa Pigato | L 36 26 | W 57 63 76 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cherubini | Rame |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.2% | 64.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 61% | 56.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.6% | 41.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 50% | 49.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 46.1% | 42.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 60.1% | 62.4% |
| BP Converted % | 46.7% | 67.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 54% | 49.9% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 43% | 57% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Diletta Cherubini and Alice Rame face off in the match at Caserta ITF on Clay.
Diletta Cherubini leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Diletta Cherubini is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Nastasja Schunk (Jun 5).
Alice Rame is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Diletta Cherubini (Jun 4).
Share this match
