WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Austin
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Parry
🤖 Servebot
Ponchet
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Diane Parry plays Jessika Ponchet.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Parry | Ponchet |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–6 | 2–3 |
| Avg odds | 2.70 | 3.44 |
| ROI % | +64.2% | +23.8% |
| Units P/L | +10.91u | +1.19u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Parry
0
Ponchet
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 3 shared opponents, both Parry and Ponchet posted a 67% win rate.
| Opponent | Parry | Ponchet |
|---|---|---|
| Ella Seidel | W | L 75 46 26 |
| Maja Chwalinska | L | W 46 63 62 |
| Anastasia Kulikova | W 64 64 | W 61 60 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Parry | Ponchet |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.1% | 55.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 52.6% | 68.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.7% | 44.6% |
| Aces / Match | 1.7 | 4.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 3.4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 46.3% | 47.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.1% | 39.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 47.8% | 50% |
| BP Converted % | 52.4% | 49.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 45.1% | 50.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Diane Parry and Jessika Ponchet face off in the Round of 32 at Austin on Hard.
Diane Parry leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Diane Parry is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Camelia Begu (Jun 21).
Jessika Ponchet is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Polina Kudermetova (Jun 23).
Share this match
