ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Heilbronn
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Novak
🛡️ The Spoiler
Daniel
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 62% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 1,609 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Taro Daniel here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Novak | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 18–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.11 |
| ROI % | - | +32.2% |
| Units P/L | - | +8.06u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Novak
1
Daniel
May 11, 2021
Heilbronn
C Clay · Quarterfinals
May 27, 2018
Roland Garros
C Clay · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 2, 2016
Furth
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Novak | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 66.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 52.1% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 65.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 31.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 49.4% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 41% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 24 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 26.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 70.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.3% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 81% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Dennis Novak and Taro Daniel face off in the Quarterfinals at Heilbronn on Clay.
Dennis Novak leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Dennis Novak is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Harry Wendelken (Oct 15).
Taro Daniel is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Aleksandr Shevchenko (Jun 13).
Share this match
