ITF M25 · Round of 16 · M25 Oldenzaal
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Wassermann
🎯 Baseliner
Handel
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 61% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 640 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Deney Wassermann here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Wassermann | Handel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | 2.95 | 3.60 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Wassermann
0
Handel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Wassermann | Handel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.1% | 56.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 50.6% | 67.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 45% | 45.2% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 46.1% | 37.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.7% | 33.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 44.3% | 52.5% |
| BP Converted % | 40% | 45.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 13 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 23 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 71.4% |
| Total Pts Won % | 39.1% | 49% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 44% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Deney Wassermann and Tim Handel face off in the Round of 16 at M25 Oldenzaal on Clay.
Deney Wassermann leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Deney Wassermann is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ivan Ivanov (Mar 30).
Tim Handel is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daniel Siniakov (Jun 9).
Share this match
