WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Hamburg
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Yastremska
🤖 Servebot
Errani
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 59% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 512 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Dayana Yastremska here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Yastremska | Errani |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–8 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.09 | - |
| ROI % | -56.7% | - |
| Units P/L | -6.24u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Yastremska
0
Errani
Apr 4, 2022
Bogota
C Clay · Round of 16
Jul 5, 2021
Hamburg
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Yastremska | Errani |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.1% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 63.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 6.8 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.7% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 36.3% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 44.2% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Dayana Yastremska and Sara Errani face off in the Quarterfinals at Hamburg on Clay.
Dayana Yastremska leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Dayana Yastremska is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Tatjana Maria (Jun 17).
Sara Errani is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Naomi Osaka (May 6).
Share this match
