WTA Finals · Quarterfinals · Charleston 2
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kovinic
💥 Big Hitter
Rogers
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Danka Kovinic plays Shelby Rogers.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kovinic | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 6.78 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Kovinic
0
Rogers
Apr 12, 2021
Charleston 2
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Oct 10, 2016
Tianjin
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kovinic | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 44.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 28% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 9 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 44.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 33.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 42.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.4% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Danka Kovinic and Shelby Rogers face off in the Quarterfinals at Charleston 2 on Clay.
Danka Kovinic leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Danka Kovinic is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Miriam Bianca Bulgaru (Jun 16).
Shelby Rogers is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jessica Pegula (Aug 26).
Share this match
