WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Tianjin
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kovinic
🏃 Pusher
Bondarenko
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🏃 Pusher archetype wins about 53% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 196 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Danka Kovinic here.
Pusher players often use extreme retrieval and low error rate to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kovinic | Bondarenko |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 7.09 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Kovinic
1
Bondarenko
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kovinic | Bondarenko |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 44.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 28% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 9 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 44.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 33.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 42.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.4% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Danka Kovinic and Kateryna Bondarenko face off in the Round of 32 at Tianjin on Hard.
Danka Kovinic leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Danka Kovinic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Fiona Ferro (May 18).
Kateryna Bondarenko is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Lina Glushko (Aug 19).
Share this match
