ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Portoroz
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Medvedev
💥 Big Hitter
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 1,189 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Daniil Medvedev here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Medvedev | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–6 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.07 | 3.61 |
| ROI % | -16.9% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -2.36u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Medvedev
0
Ilkel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Medvedev | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.4% | 53.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.4% | 70.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.6% | 51.2% |
| Aces / Match | 4.3 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 60.9% | 71.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.1% | 41.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.6% | 46.4% |
| BP Converted % | 36.5% | 100% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 24.3 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 27.2 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 69% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.3% | 53.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Daniil Medvedev and Cem Ilkel face off in the Round of 32 at Portoroz on Hard.
Daniil Medvedev leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Daniil Medvedev is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Terence Atmane (Jun 17).
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Share this match
