ATP Masters 1000 · Round of 32 · ATP Masters 1000 Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Medvedev
💥 Big Hitter
Miralles
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 58% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 2,418 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Daniil Medvedev here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Medvedev | Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–6 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.07 | 7.56 |
| ROI % | -16.9% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -2.36u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Medvedev
0
Miralles
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Medvedev | Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.4% | 47.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.4% | 87% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.6% | 52% |
| Aces / Match | 4.3 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 60.9% | 100% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.1% | 55.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.6% | 70% |
| BP Converted % | 36.5% | 83.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 24.3 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 27.2 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 69% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.3% | 64.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 56% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Daniil Medvedev and Bernabe Zapata Miralles face off in the Round of 32 at ATP Masters 1000 Rome on Clay.
Daniil Medvedev leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Daniil Medvedev is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Terence Atmane (Jun 17).
Bernabe Zapata Miralles is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Adolfo Daniel Vallejo (May 7).
Share this match
