ATP 500 · Round of 32 · Astana
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Medvedev
💥 Big Hitter
Ramos-Vinolas
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 4,242 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Daniil Medvedev here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Medvedev | Ramos-Vinolas |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.07 | - |
| ROI % | -16.9% | - |
| Units P/L | -2.36u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Medvedev
0
Ramos-Vinolas
Oct 4, 2022
Astana
H Hard · Round of 32
Apr 12, 2019
Barcelona
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Medvedev | Ramos-Vinolas |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 60.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.6% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 36.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 24.3 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 27.2 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 69% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.3% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Daniil Medvedev and Albert Ramos-Vinolas face off in the Round of 32 at Astana on Hard.
Daniil Medvedev leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Daniil Medvedev is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Terence Atmane (Jun 17).
Albert Ramos-Vinolas is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jan Choinski (Oct 9).
Share this match
