ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · UAMS Health Little Rock Open
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Smith
⚙️ Grinder
Milavsky
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 3,473 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Daniel Milavsky here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Smith | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.68 | - |
| ROI % | -21.8% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.96u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
First career meeting
Smith and Milavsky have never faced each other on tour.
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 2 shared opponents, both Smith and Milavsky posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Smith | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Keegan Smith | W 76 61 | W 63 75 |
| Blaise Bicknell | W 57 76 61 | W 67 61 63 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Smith | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.3% | 48.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66% | 82.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52.4% | 53.3% |
| Aces / Match | 4.4 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54.2% | 66.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 33.3% | 35.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46% | 62.1% |
| BP Converted % | 39.2% | 27.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 17.6 | 10 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 30.3 | 21 |
| Net Pts Won % | 61.4% | 83.3% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.3% | 54.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Mexico City Open presentado por Banco BX+ · Round of 32
Apr 7
Alexis Galarneau
Steve Carter Baton Rouge Challenger · Quarterfinals
Feb 13
Raphael Perot
Steve Carter Baton Rouge Challenger · Round of 16
Feb 12
Keegan Smith
Steve Carter Baton Rouge Challenger · Round of 32
Feb 10
Joshua Sheehy
Cleveland Open · Quarterfinals
Feb 6
Match summary
Colton Smith meets Daniel Milavsky in the Round of 16 at the UAMS Health Little Rock Open on May 27, an outdoor hard court event. Smith is ranked 185; Milavsky sits at 348. The two have never played each other.
Smith has won 3 of his last 10 matches but arrives after a seven-match losing streak and a 37-day layoff. Milavsky has taken 4 of his last 10 as well, though his two-match skid is fresher and he last played 50 days ago. Both players hold a 50% win rate on hard courts in recent samples.
Smith operates as a baseline grinder, relying on consistency and extended rallies to wear opponents down. Milavsky plays an aggressive, power-oriented game designed to finish points quickly. On hard courts, Milavsky's heavy ball-striking and Smith's willingness to extend exchanges present a fundamental contrast in approach. Smith will need to dictate rallies and sustain extended sequences; Milavsky must convert his opportunities before the points drift into his opponent's wheelhouse.
Get $25 free
New accounts only. Create a Kalshi account and predict match outcomes.
Claim offerShare this match
