WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Stuttgart
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Vandeweghe
🤖 Servebot
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 60% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,639 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Coco Vandeweghe here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Vandeweghe | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.74 |
| ROI % | - | -68.2% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.41u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Vandeweghe
1
Stephens
Apr 23, 2018
Stuttgart
C Clay · Round of 32
Aug 31, 2015
US Open
H Hard · Round of 128
May 18, 2015
Strasbourg
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Vandeweghe | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 65.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 46.8% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 56.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 25.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 39.4% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 49.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 40.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 17% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Coco Vandeweghe and Sloane Stephens face off in the Round of 32 at Stuttgart on Clay.
Coco Vandeweghe leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Coco Vandeweghe is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Robin Montgomery (Feb 27).
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Share this match
