WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Madrid
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Vandeweghe
🤖 Servebot
Siegemund
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 54% vs 🤖 Servebot across 978 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Laura Siegemund here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the servebot's high ace rate. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Vandeweghe | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.38 |
| ROI % | - | -27.4% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.29u |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Vandeweghe
1
Siegemund
Jan 20, 2020
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 128
May 28, 2018
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 128
Apr 23, 2018
Stuttgart
C Clay · Round of 16
May 8, 2017
Madrid
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Vandeweghe | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 75.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 55.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 38.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 60.8% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 52.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Coco Vandeweghe and Laura Siegemund face off in the Round of 32 at Madrid on Clay.
Coco Vandeweghe leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Coco Vandeweghe is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Robin Montgomery (Feb 27).
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Amanda Anisimova (Jun 10).
Share this match
