WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Indian Wells
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gauff
🪃 Counterpuncher
Peterson
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 66% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 366 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Coco Gauff here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Gauff | Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–0 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.18 | - |
| ROI % | +118.0% | - |
| Units P/L | +2.36u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Gauff
0
Peterson
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Gauff | Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.9% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 40.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.4 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 43.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 46.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 86% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Coco Gauff and Rebecca Peterson face off in the Round of 16 at Indian Wells on Hard.
Coco Gauff leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Coco Gauff is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Mirra Andreeva (May 5).
Rebecca Peterson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Iga Swiatek (Aug 28).
Share this match
