ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Champaign
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Eubanks
🤖 Servebot
Zhu
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Christopher Eubanks here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Eubanks | Zhu |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 7–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.46 |
| ROI % | - | +58.8% |
| Units P/L | - | +5.29u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Eubanks
0
Zhu
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Eubanks | Zhu |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 52.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 53.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 34.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 51.2% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 47.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 24 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 38 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 66.7% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.7% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Christopher Eubanks and Evan Zhu face off in the Quarterfinals at Champaign on Hard.
Christopher Eubanks leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Christopher Eubanks is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Matej Dodig (Oct 6).
Evan Zhu is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hoyoung Roh (Jun 16).
Share this match
