ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Lugano
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Sachko
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs 🏹 Frontrunner is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 122 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Cem Ilkel plays Vitaliy Sachko.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 10–8 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 1.99 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | +5.9% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | +1.06u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Ilkel
0
Sachko
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 62.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 61.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 46.2% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 3.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 2.4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 45% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 34.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 48.8% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 39.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 19.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 34.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 56.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 47.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Vitaliy Sachko face off in the Quarterfinals at Lugano on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Vitaliy Sachko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aleksandr Shevchenko (Jun 13).
Share this match
