ATP Challenger Tour Β· Semifinals Β· Izmir
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
π The Complete Package
Gombos
πͺ Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
π The Complete Package vs πͺ Counterpuncher is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,062 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Cem Ilkel plays Norbert Gombos.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0β1 | 8β9 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 2.15 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -29.4% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -5.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 1 career meeting
1
Ilkel
0
Gombos
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 57% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 75.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 50.9% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 4.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 3.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 54.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 32.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 48.4% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 42.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 17.3 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 30.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 55.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 51.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Norbert Gombos face off in the Semifinals at Izmir on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Norbert Gombos is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dalibor Svrcina (Jun 17).
Share this match