ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Split 2
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Gaston
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Cem Ilkel plays Hugo Gaston.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Gaston |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 4–10 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 2.48 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -58.9% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -8.25u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Ilkel
1
Gaston
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Gaston |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 56.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 64.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 46.8% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 2.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 46.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 32.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 46.5% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 39.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 19.8 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 36.3 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 68% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 47.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 36% |
Last five matches per player
Felix Gill
Lexus Nottingham Open · Round of 32
Jun 8
Francisco Cerundolo
Roland Garros · Round of 64
May 28
Gael Monfils
Roland Garros · Round of 128
May 25
Ignacio Buse
Bitpanda Hamburg Open · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 17
Marko Topo
Bitpanda Hamburg Open · 1st Round Qualifying
May 16
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Hugo Gaston face off in the Round of 16 at Split 2 on Clay.
Cem Ilkel leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Hugo Gaston is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Felix Gill (Jun 8).
Share this match
