ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Astana 2
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Karlovskiy
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Cem Ilkel plays Evgeny Karlovskiy.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Karlovskiy |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 2.40 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -44.7% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -1.34u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Ilkel
1
Karlovskiy
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Karlovskiy |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 73.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 66% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 44% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 2.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 61.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 24.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 52.9% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 51.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 48% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 40% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Evgeny Karlovskiy face off in the Round of 32 at Astana 2 on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Evgeny Karlovskiy is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Robin Catry (May 18).
Share this match
