ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Split 2
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Couacaud
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 1,189 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Enzo Couacaud here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Couacaud |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Ilkel
1
Couacaud
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Couacaud |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Enzo Couacaud face off in the Round of 32 at Split 2 on Clay.
Cem Ilkel leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Enzo Couacaud is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Mikhail Kukushkin (Sep 9).
Share this match
