ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · St. Petersburg 1
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Stricker
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
Both Cem Ilkel and Dominic Stricker are 👑 The Complete Package types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 298 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 4–4 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 2.00 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -42.1% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -3.37u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ilkel
0
Stricker
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 57.1% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 76.3% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 55.6% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 49.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 28.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 50.5% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 55.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 14 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 27.5 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 38.5% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 52.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Dominic Stricker face off in the Round of 16 at St. Petersburg 1 on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Dominic Stricker is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kai Wehnelt (Jun 19).
Share this match
