ATP Challenger Tour · Semifinals · Vilnius
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Added
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 1,398 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Dan Added here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Added |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 1–8 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 2.80 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -74.2% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -6.68u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ilkel
0
Added
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Added |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 55.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 61.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 44.9% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 2.4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 48.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 32.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 46.7% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 47.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 12 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 18 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 28.6% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 45.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 67% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Dan Added face off in the Semifinals at Vilnius on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Dan Added is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Niels Visker (Jun 14).
Share this match
