ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Fergana
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Setkic
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Cem Ilkel plays Aldin Setkic.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Setkic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 1.59 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ilkel
0
Setkic
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Setkic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 70.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 65.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 41.1% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 2.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 3.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 23.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 30.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 49.7% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 51.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 48.2% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Aldin Setkic face off in the Round of 16 at Fergana on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Aldin Setkic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Yurii Dzhavakian (Jun 17).
Share this match
