WTA 250 · Birmingham
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Naef
👑 The Complete Package
Zhao
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 63% vs 🎾 All-Court across 607 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Celine Naef here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Grass, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Naef | Zhao |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–2 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 3.88 | 1.09 |
| ROI % | +130.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | +3.90u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Naef
0
Zhao
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Naef | Zhao |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 66.3% | 67.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64% | 57.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.4% | 32.8% |
| Aces / Match | 4 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2 | 6.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 50% | 47.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 43.9% | 35.7% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 51.1% | 51.4% |
| BP Converted % | 37.2% | 37% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.5% | 44.8% |
| Surface (Grass) | ||
| Grass Win % | 67% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Celine Naef and Carol Zhao face off in the match at Birmingham on Grass.
Celine Naef leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Celine Naef is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Mary Stoiana (Jun 4).
Carol Zhao is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Celine Naef (May 30).
Share this match
