ITF W Β· Rome ITF
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Jauffret
πͺ Counterpuncher
Frey
π― Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The π― Baseliner archetype wins about 54% vs πͺ Counterpuncher across 437 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anna Frey here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Jauffret | Frey |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6β5 | 0β1 |
| Avg odds | 2.74 | 1.99 |
| ROI % | -14.4% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.58u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 1 career meeting
1
Jauffret
0
Frey
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Jauffret | Frey |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 56.3% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 60.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 42.4% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.4 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 44% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 59.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 53.7% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.2% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Capucine Jauffret and Anna Frey face off in the match at Rome ITF on Hard.
Capucine Jauffret leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Capucine Jauffret is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ena Koike (Jun 25).
Anna Frey is 0-2 over the last 2 matches. Latest result: L vs Capucine Jauffret (Jun 24).
Share this match