WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Seoul
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Giorgi
💥 Big Hitter
Barthel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 56% vs 💥 Big Hitter across 4,219 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Mona Barthel here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the big hitter's power groundstrokes. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Giorgi | Barthel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.76 |
| ROI % | - | -23.8% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.19u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Giorgi
1
Barthel
May 1, 2017
Prague
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Sep 19, 2016
Seoul
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Giorgi | Barthel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 71.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 8.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 40.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.5% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 50.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 54.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 100% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Camila Giorgi and Mona Barthel face off in the Round of 16 at Seoul on Hard.
Camila Giorgi leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Camila Giorgi is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Magdalena Frech (Mar 18).
Mona Barthel is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hanne Vandewinkel (Jun 6).
Share this match
