WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Palermo
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Giorgi
💥 Big Hitter
Yastremska
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Camila Giorgi plays Dayana Yastremska.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Giorgi | Yastremska |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.09 |
| ROI % | - | -56.7% |
| Units P/L | - | -6.24u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
1
Giorgi
2
Yastremska
Sep 14, 2020
Rome
C Clay · Round of 64
Aug 3, 2020
Palermo
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Jul 1, 2019
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 128
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Giorgi | Yastremska |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 58.1% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 63.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.8% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 6.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 36.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 54% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 44.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Camila Giorgi and Dayana Yastremska face off in the Quarterfinals at Palermo on Clay.
Camila Giorgi leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Camila Giorgi is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Magdalena Frech (Mar 18).
Dayana Yastremska is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Tatjana Maria (Jun 17).
Share this match
