ATP 250 · Round of 16 · Munich
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zandschulp
🤖 Servebot
Gerasimov
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Botic van de Zandschulp and Egor Gerasimov are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 13,712 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zandschulp | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.24 | - |
| ROI % | -18.8% | - |
| Units P/L | -2.25u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Zandschulp
0
Gerasimov
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zandschulp | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.3% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.9 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 55.7% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 33.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 49.2% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 38.8% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 35 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 72.2% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 55% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Tommy Paul
HSBC Championships · Round of 16
Jun 12
Tallon Griekspoor
Libema Open · Round of 32
Jun 10
Harry Wendelken
HSBC Championships · Round of 32
Jun 9
Francisco Cerundolo
Roland Garros · Round of 128
May 26
Quentin Halys
BNP Paribas Primrose Bordeaux · Round of 16
May 15
Matchup overview
Botic van de Zandschulp and Egor Gerasimov face off in the Round of 16 at Munich on Clay.
Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Botic van de Zandschulp is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Tommy Paul (Jun 12).
Egor Gerasimov is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daniil Ostapenkov (Jan 12).
Share this match
