WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pera
🤖 Servebot
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,124 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Bernarda Pera here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pera | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.25 |
| ROI % | - | -50.7% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.52u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Pera
1
Zidansek
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Pera | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Bernarda Pera and Tamara Zidansek face off in the Round of 64 at Rome on Clay.
Bernarda Pera leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Bernarda Pera is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Eva Lys (Aug 7).
Tamara Zidansek is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Zhuoxuan Bai (Jun 23).
Share this match
