WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Madrid
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Maia
⚙️ Grinder
Pera
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 476 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Bernarda Pera here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Maia | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.72 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -4.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Maia
0
Pera
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Maia has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Pera's 0%).
| Opponent | Maia | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | W 36 64 76 | L 67 67 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Maia | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.1% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 57.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 32.3% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 6.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.6% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 47.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 19.4% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 42.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Beatriz Haddad Maia and Bernarda Pera face off in the Round of 64 at Madrid on Clay.
Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Beatriz Haddad Maia is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Leolia Jeanjean (May 5).
Bernarda Pera is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Eva Lys (Aug 7).
Share this match
