WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Strycova
🎯 Baseliner
Siegemund
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 54% vs 🎯 Baseliner across 236 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Laura Siegemund here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the baseliner's precise groundstrokes. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Strycova | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.26 |
| ROI % | - | -33.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -4.29u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Strycova
1
Siegemund
Jul 1, 2019
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 64
Apr 23, 2018
Stuttgart
C Clay · Round of 32
Oct 3, 2016
Beijing
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Strycova | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 75.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 55.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 38.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 60.8% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 52.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Barbora Strycova and Laura Siegemund face off in the Round of 64 at Beijing on Hard.
Barbora Strycova leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Barbora Strycova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kaia Kanepi (Aug 28).
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (Jun 23).
Share this match
