WTA 1000 · Round of 128 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Krueger
🤖 Servebot
Bondar
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Ashlyn Krueger and Anna Bondar are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 3,172 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Krueger | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–5 | 9–9 |
| Avg odds | 1.74 | 3.27 |
| ROI % | +7.2% | +12.4% |
| Units P/L | +0.93u | +2.23u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Krueger
0
Bondar
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Krueger has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Bondar's 20%).
| Opponent | Krueger | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| Darja Vidmanova | W | W 75 75 |
| Elina Svitolina | L 46 26 | L |
| Madison Keys | L 16 57 | L 26 57 |
| Anastasia Zakharova | W 75 63 | L 75 36 16 |
| Maria Sakkari | W 26 63 64 | L 36 16 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Krueger | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.6% | 63.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 61.7% | 63.9% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 42.5% | 48.9% |
| Aces / Match | 4.7 | 3.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.7 | 1.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 44% | 67.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.7% | 35.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 55.3% | 58.1% |
| BP Converted % | 50% | 47% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.5% | 51.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 44% | 53% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Ashlyn Krueger and Anna Bondar face off in the Round of 128 at Rome on Clay.
Ashlyn Krueger leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Ashlyn Krueger is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Celine Naef (Jun 14).
Anna Bondar is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Emma Navarro (Jun 15).
Share this match
