ATP Masters 1000 · Round of 32 · Mutua Madrid Open
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Fils
💥 Big Hitter
Nava
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
Both Arthur Fils and Emilio Nava are 💥 Big Hitter types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 4,838 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Fils | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–2 | 15–10 |
| Avg odds | 1.89 | 1.96 |
| ROI % | +18.6% | -4.5% |
| Units P/L | +2.23u | -1.12u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Fils
1
Nava
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Fils has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Nava's 60%).
| Opponent | Fils | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Jiri Lehecka | W 63 64 | L 67 76 26 |
| Valentin Vacherot | W 64 67 64 | W 67 76 63 |
| Andrey Rublev | W 62 76 | L 75 46 36 |
| Terence Atmane | W 46 64 76 | W 62 75 |
| Quentin Halys | W 61 76 | W 64 64 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Fils | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.6% | 63.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.3% | 72% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 49.9% | 49.8% |
| Aces / Match | 3.5 | 6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 49% | 58.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 26.3% | 32.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 42.5% | 45% |
| BP Converted % | 28% | 44.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 16.8 | 22.8 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 24.9 | 31.1 |
| Net Pts Won % | 56.2% | 72.2% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.5% | 50.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 82% | 61% |
Last five matches per player
Match summary
Arthur Fils meets Emilio Nava in the Round of 32 at the Mutua Madrid Open on April 26, a clay court event that shapes the spring swing. Fils arrives ranked 25th with a 6-match winning streak, while Nava at 116th sits on a 2-match run. Two days separate each player from their last match.
The two have met once before, with Nava taking that encounter. In recent form, Fils has won 9 of his last 10 matches; Nava has won 6 of 10. On clay specifically, Fils owns a 16-4 record (80%) across a relevant sample, while Nava stands at 11-9 (55%). Both players defeated Quentin Halys and Terence Atmane in recent play, though Fils beat Andrey Rublev where Nava fell.
Fils operates as a baseline grinder who constructs points through consistency and court positioning. Nava hits heavy off both wings and looks to dictate with power. Clay typically rewards patience and lateral movement, asking Fils to extend rallies and Nava to convert his aggressive opportunities into winners before points drift into extended exchanges.
Share this match
