WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Tashkent
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Gasparyan
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
Both Anna Lena Friedsam and Margarita Gasparyan are 💥 Big Hitter types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 6,968 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Friedsam | Gasparyan |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.45 | - |
| ROI % | -29.4% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.47u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Friedsam
1
Gasparyan
Jul 1, 2019
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 128
Oct 12, 2015
Linz
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Sep 28, 2015
Tashkent
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Friedsam | Gasparyan |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 72.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.2% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 28.6% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Lena Friedsam and Margarita Gasparyan face off in the Round of 16 at Tashkent on Hard.
Anna Lena Friedsam leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Margarita Gasparyan is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Han Shi (Oct 28).
Share this match
